Talk:Broadcast News (film)

United States: District of Columbia Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Low-importance).

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Library of Congress Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Library of Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Library of Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Library of CongressWikipedia:WikiProject Library of CongressTemplate:WikiProject Library of CongressLibrary of Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Organization[edit]

This page has lots of info on it but no scheme of organization. If someone just organized it, it would be so much better. -- Supernumerary 01:22, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

While the site is well written, this is not a review forum. If the review is from someone else then it needs to be cited.Manofthespoon 00:33, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've started to clean it up and reorganize but it's going to take a lot of work and sadly there doesn't seem to be too many sources of it on the Internet. Count Ringworm 16:05, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation[edit]

Searching for an article on this movie from the main site immediately redirects the user to the article on "News", one cannot find the article on the movie by searching on this wiki.

Removal of spoiler warnings[edit]

There is a ongoing community debate about spoilers and how (and if) they should be used. The wholseale removal of them is pre-empting that result of that debate before a consensus is declared. While the debate is ongoing, the status quo should be maintained, and that means that spoilers should (and shall) stay in place until a consensus is reached. Please do not continue to delete them, and they will just be replaced. If you feel strongly about this, go participate in the debate -- if your point of view prevails, then there's nothing to stop spoilers from being removed. Until then, please cease. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk/cont) 05:44, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Broadcast News is one of those rare films where you don't know how it's going to end. This is part of the pleasure of watching it. It would be a shame to spoil that pleasure for someone reading this article. WilliamSommerwerck (talk) 15:22, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rom-com?[edit]

Is it really accurate to describe this movie as a "romantic comedy"? It features many strongly dramatic themes, and overall could probably be considered more a drama than a romantic comedy.

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 15:12, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Broadcast News.jpg[edit]

File:Broadcast News.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:56, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Headlines[edit]

articles to use for this article.--J.D. (talk) 14:51, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]