Talk:Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
|The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of the article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.|
|This article was the subject of an educational assignment that ended on Fall 2006. Further details are available here.|
Links to external links such as the online edition and the doomsday clock do not lead to any where except junk. Perhaps they changed their addresses? VeriGGlater 12:20, 12 April, 2007 (UTC)
- Woo-hoo! They work again. Maybe it was their site since I couldn't get those links to work by typing them in either. VeriGGlater 12:01, 1 September, 2007 (UTC)
The "fear" section is a bit confusing. It's hard to tell whether the Bulletin supports disarmment or not. Could use some clarification from someone who knows what they're talking about. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 23:38, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 09:45, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
I think there's a NPOV problem with the Doomsday part of the article.It mentions it moved to 2 minutes to midnight "as Soviet Union continued to test more and more devices".It was not only the Soviets,but the US had also tested a H-bomb 9 months earlier or later(I forget which),which prompted the move to 2 minutes.The article can be interpreted to lay the entire blame at the door of the Soviets. EaswarH (talk) 01:01, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
The following statement is inaccurate: "The Bulletin has been partially available on-line for some years, the entire content becoming fully available on-line as a paid digital subscription late in 2008."
Politically motivated edit?
"In January 25, 2018, the bulletin convened and dubiously [according to who?] set the clock 30 seconds later. It was alleged [by who?] that the bulletin was under political influence [by who?] to undermined the Trump administration efforts to denuclearise North Korea, marking the start of partisanship in the bulletin. [says who? and source needed] "
This entire part was added without any citation except for ones stating that the clock was in fact moved 30 seconds forward. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 00:32, 26 January 2018 (UTC)