Talk:Buried Secrets (Body of Proof)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Buried Secrets (Body of Proof) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
August 4, 2012 Good article nominee Listed
Did You Know
WikiProject Television (Rated GA-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of television on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

DYK nomination[edit]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Buried Secrets (Body of Proof)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 16:20, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

  • Intro: "doing freelance on a" -> "doing freelance work on a". Same thing in the plot section. Yes check.svg Done
  • Plot: "her boss's, Kate Murphy" -> "her boss Kate Murphy's" Yes check.svg Done
  • Plot: Again, don't need to reference the episode with the episode See: Letting Go Review. X mark.svg Not done
  • Reception: "Among viewers between ages 18 and 49, it received a 2.1 rating/9 share; a share represents the percentage of households using a television at the time the program is airing." -> "Among viewers between ages 18 and 49, it received a 2.1 rating/9 share. This means that it was seen by 2.1 percent of all 18- to 49-year-olds, and 9 percent of all 18- to 49-year-olds watching television at the time of the broadcast." Yes check.svg Done
  • Reception: Any more reviews? - :( No. Body of Proof is only reviewed by TV Fanatic.
  • Notes: These don't make very much sense grammatically. For instance "Although credited as "Coach Lou Davis" the ABC use the version of "Coach Hal Davis" as his name." should, ideally, be "Although credited as "Coach Lou Davis", ABC uses the name "Coach Hal Davis"". Same for all of them. Yes check.svg Done
  • References: add writer and director for Refs 1, 7-8 See: Letting Go Review X mark.svg Not done
  • References: Use consistent dating Yes check.svg Done

On hold for seven days.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 22:52, 2 August 2012 (UTC) - Done - Thanks! — M.Mario (T/C) 16:43, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Looks good. Pass.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 02:33, 4 August 2012 (UTC)