From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Oral History?[edit]

Whilst not wanting to put a downer on contributions that help expand these small articles, can an oral history be an acceptable and reliable source?Rimmer1993 (talk) 13:00, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

It can, but not this one. Any source has to be reliable, and if it's the view (original research) of one person, that person has to be notable - if the quote has been written somewhere it could be copyvio, if not it's certainly original research. The text should be removed. Even there if is a reliable source for the stuff, it's too long anyway - WP:QUOTEFARM. Acabashi (talk) 18:22, 18 December 2013 (UTC)