Talk:Côtes du Rhône AOC

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Wine (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of wines, grapes, winemaking and wine-producing regions on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Food and drink (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
 

Untitled[edit]

While spending a little time improving this from a few lines by the original author, I then realised that there is an article entitled Rhône wine. I found the article far more developed already but feel they should be merged - but under which title? - Or developing them separately as the two notions are in fact quite different. I could undertake the splitting and copy editing but would need some feedback first. Kudpung 08:31, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

I think there is good reason to keep both articles. The Rhône wine is already wikilinked from the first sentence of this article, and is therefore easy to find from this article. Please notice the title of this article - Côtes du Rhône AOC. I.e., this is an article on the wines produced under that appellation, not on all Rhône wines. Thus, material on Côte Rôtie wine is not really relevant to this article. (By the way, Côte Rôtie is not a village.) Tomas e (talk) 17:03, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
You are right of course, Rotie is indee a cru - I think this got left in from one of the earlier editors. Thanks for all the heavy editing and improvements to style. Looks good. Kudpung (talk) 05:51, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging[edit]

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 03:28, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Wine Map[edit]

Although the wine map is quite comprehensive it does not include all the cru wine regions e.g Vinsobres. Also it has some colours that are not referenced. It would be better to find a map that does include them. It also quite pointlessly has the overall region and the zoom separate, if it just contained the overall region to the zoom level of the insets it would probably be a smaller map with just as much information.Darlough (talk) 13:41, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Côtes du Rhône AOC/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

==Côtes du Rhône== I am suggesting that this article is as near complete as it needs to be. Many of the wines of the individual Côtes du Rhône Villages and crus of the appelation now have their own pages and we are working on the others. Articles in an encyclopedia are not necessarily judged on their length. Could we have a new rating please? Kudpung (talk) 09:13, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Last edited at 09:13, 5 May 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 12:39, 29 April 2016 (UTC)