|This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to . If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.|
|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
As per WP:TALK "Talk pages are not for general conversation. Keep discussions on the topic of how to improve the associated article. Irrelevant discussions are subject to removal."--Shantavira|feed me 09:04, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Presumably, nationality is what the person themselves chooses it to be, within reason. Which would lead me to suggest that Calum Best sees himself as British, and, I expect, has a British passport. A quick look at the nationality article shows: "nationality is established at birth by a child's place of birth (jus soli) and/or bloodline (jus sanguinis)". Taking the bloodline reasoning, both his parents are British, so he is as well. Taking the other side, he was born in the US, which could potentially give him American status too.
You can't argue that he's not British, but you perhaps could argue that he's both British and American. Which is where I would say it becomes his choice. But I don't know if that would be a "legal" definition. --184.108.40.206 22:46, 15 November 2007 (UTC).
Being born in the US doesn't "potentially" give you American status, it makes you American. As per the 14th amendment. He is free to call himself British if he likes, but Wiki is not obligated to describe a person by their own preferred definition. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 01:08, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
I think Kiwi is obligated to do whatever a living person does in living their life. Otherwise we could say that Michael Jackson is black when he clearly is white. If he is not American you lot can't claim him. That is a form of hostage taking by one country civilian to another one. --18.104.22.168 (talk) 22:21, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
The entry now says "British-American" which is pretty accurate. He was born from British parents who just happened to be living in USA as the father was playing football there as many UK footballers go there to play after they have past their peak in the UK. The parents split up a year later and the mother stayed on in the USA with Calum. To me Calum is a Brit born in America and hence British-American is pretty fair. If the USA are offended by this they are probably welcome to have him! 22.214.171.124 (talk) 13:47, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Surely if you can refer to a black man as African-American where you might have to look back several generations to find an antecedent that set foot in Africa, and will quite likely have the blood of a white slave master somewhere in his family tree, it is not too much of a stretch to refer to someone that was born in the US of British parents as "British-American"?126.96.36.199 (talk) 10:31, 8 October 2015 (UTC)