This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Per consensus, no other article by the same title, therefore no need to dab. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 13:38, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Obviously some form of consensus or lack of same will decide this matter or leave it undecided, since comments by Uanfala, In ictu oculi and Necrothesp at that nomination offer a countervailing interpretation of WP:SONGDAB and WP:DAB. That nomination posits that the three-sentence song stub is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC of the I Can't Get Over You disambiguation page, while this nomination posits that the nearly-same three-sentence song stub here is not the primary topic over two same-named songs. —Roman Spinner(talk • contribs) 19:15, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose by technicality, well, I'll be honest. I think this song is probably not notable. However, it has an article, the others do not, so we can handle that at deletion venues, but if it stays without an article, we don't need to delete it (because the others song are not notable either). --Quiz shows 05:16, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. There's no other article using the title, so no need to disambiguate the title. If other articles are ever written, this can always be reconsidered. Station1 (talk) 04:58, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
