Talk:Carbon Disclosure Project

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


The text is taken word for word from Nuttah68 16:07, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

I think this article is partial and has no encyclopedical value. (M.R.M, Ph.D., Specialist on climate change) —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 14:16, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Can anyone see any reason to keep this page? Obviously an advert, and I don't think it's notable enough to keep even if it was rewritten. Restepc 18:34, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

I think that the Carbon Disclosure Project is an organisation that is important enough to justify an entry. In a few short years they have gone from an idea to forcing /enabling companies to report their carbon emissions. Climate change is an important issue and CDP are playing a strong role. As an example the World Economic Forum has invited them to be the secretariat for a project which will create globally-recognised carbon disclosure guidelines for companies.

The second question is whether the page is good enough. Clearly a cut and paste job from a brochure is not good enough. So, perhaps it needs a good re-write? (A first time contribution - so apologies if I don't get the etiquette right.) bentdavid (talk) 17:41, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

After a bit of googling I'm inclined to agree. Welcome to wiki by the way, are you the same David Bent from

Etiquette wise, as long as you're polite and try to keep edits of actual pages neutral I wouldn't worry.

Restepc (talk) 20:05, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Having problems adding the citations requested for the HBR and Zayed prize. Perhaps someone with more experience than I have can successd.

HBR sourcce is

Zayed prize is not yet on Zayed website but is public at

When I try to add things it is locked onto a CDP site and I do not have the know how to get around it. Neil Fairhead 00:02, 19 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neil Fairhead (talkcontribs)

Hello. I want to state first up that I work for CDP, so I'm wary of making any changes myself. However, there is quite a lot of outdated information on this page as you can see from CDP's website (, recent press releases ( and various articles ( ; AlexCDP (talk) 08:56, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi - it has been suggested by others ( that despite my conflict of interest (I work for CDP), it is acceptable for me to make purely factual, well-sourced edits. This I intend to do, but please do let me know if there are any queries over the edits I have made. AlexCDP (talk) 14:44, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Carbon Disclosure Project. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:09, 15 November 2016 (UTC)