Is it allowed to put your own tutorial web site in an article? I believe the tips and tutorials section is just an advertisement.--18.104.22.168 (talk) 06:17, 26 February 2008 (UTC) Wow, this sure reads like an advertisement. several advertisements, actually. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 18:27, 15 September 2010 (UTC) I don't know how to flag this in the article, but the features section is cryptic to an average reader, and unreferenced.(Scyg (talk) 11:14, 25 May 2012 (UTC))
this entry reads like corporate fluff
For instance, the listing of all the amazing functions doesn't mention that half are for PC only and aren't working yet on the Mac version.
Their "open development cycle" would be a lot prettier if they actually fixed anything on the current cycle. Aside from ap-breaking issues, most of what is learned from the public beta is not applied towards the newest release, but instead put in pipeline for the NEXT release on. The net result is that, effectively, the software is ALWAYS in beta. The only thing that changes is whether it is a free pre-release, or whether the user is paying for it.