Talk:Cars (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Cars (film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Semi-protected edit request on 26 March 2017[edit]

2001:8003:2174:4400:5856:4F05:3423:B98D (talk) 07:18, 26 March 2017 (UTC) SCRUBBBB
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. ChamithN (talk) 09:05, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Cars (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:28, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Chick hicks from cars the movie[edit]

I think he is more like a 1980's Volvo 240 General.jordet (talk) 14:54, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

He's almost certainly modeled after an '80s GM stock car. Here's a GNX: [1], and here's Chick: [2] - though, the note in the article really should be sourced... --Fru1tbat (talk) 15:03, 20 April 2017 (UTC)