This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Maps and Cartography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
The examples cited cover many countries apart from India, and there is no suggestion that the point of view of India or any other country is valid, only that certain countries (India among them) have claimed to be the victims of cartographic aggression. As regards the 'Pro indian' comment below, the commentator has completely failed to comprehend the meaning of cartographic aggression, and because of this has cited completely non-cartographic aggressive activities such as sending RAW agents or military operations in the Siachen. About the only non-NPOV remark is that favouring Chad, and that is justified by the Hague ruling. Oropolitics (talk) 16:30, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
this article completely ignores the indian aggression over azad kashmir and sending in RAW agents into pakistan and then attacking pakistani posts in siachen DELETION REQUIRED. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 14:46, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
It seems to me that cartographic aggression should be distinct from physical aggression, that is, war. If it precedes war by a significant amount of time, then it should count as cartographic, though. Gah4 (talk) 18:52, 21 February 2017 (UTC) Also, the article only mentions countries. Is it possible for cities, counties, states, or provinces to also use cartographic aggression? Gah4 (talk) 18:52, 21 February 2017 (UTC)