Talk:Census of Ireland, 1911

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Ireland (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: superseded by discussion at Talk:2001 Bangladesh census. Kotniski (talk) 12:43, 29 June 2011 (UTC)


Census of Ireland, 1911Census of Ireland 1911 – Please move to rename article without comma in title to maintain consistent naming policy for Irish census articles. Compare Census of Ireland 2011. — O'Dea (talk) 21:44, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

  • Oppose. The title needs a separator between Ireland and the year. In my opinion, it should either be 1911 census of Ireland or remain at the current title. Jenks24 (talk) 15:01, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
  • Comment. There are many articles in Wikipedia with unpunctuated titles. The following dozen illustrate the point:

There is no rule requiring punctuation in titles. — O'Dea (talk) 07:47, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

  • Comment For the sake of consistency the article should be changed, however, I personally feel that actually a comma should be used as is the case for elections across Wikipedia. However if this were to be done obviously it would recquire a new discussion. Shatter Resistance (talk) 15:10, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Oppose - Per my earlier commment I have opened up a new discussion on a general standardisation of census articles (which currently are very varied) my proposal includes the comma so the proposed move to this page would deviate from that and so I don't feel this proposal should go ahead. Shatter Resistance (talk) 16:29, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
(That's at Talk:2001 Bangladesh census, in case anyone was wondering.)--Kotniski (talk) 12:43, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.