Talk:Central Churchmanship

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Christianity / Anglicanism (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Anglicanism.
 

Last Paragraph[edit]

I question two of the statements here. Did central churchmanship decline because of the closure of certain theological colleges, or were the colleges closed because the number of "central churchmen" who came forward for ordination declined first? Furthermore, if central churchmanship is still the mainstay, why are its representatives relatively invisible in Church affairs. (My impression is that central churchmanship has become mildly high church in ceremonial matters but that may simply be that there is no detailed agreement on where the boundaries between various groupings lie.)--Jpacobb (talk) 22:23, 11 November 2011 (UTC) I have deleted the "mainstay" comment since Hylson-Smith's figures show that is it no longer true. Broad Church (which may well be wider than Central Churchmanship) comes in fouth place behind Evangelicals, Anglo-Catholics and Liberals with only 18%.Jpacobb (talk) 18:46, 2 March 2012 (UTC)