Talk:Centropomidae

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Latidae and Centropomidae[edit]

WP:FISH suggests that the taxonomy used by FishBase should be followed. FishBase recognizes Latidae as a separate family, rather than classifying Latinae within this family. Therefore, I'm changing the redirect Latidae to an article on that family. --Ginkgo100 talk · contribs · e@ 20:47, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was procedural close. This is indeed a merge you're asking for, but I'm not sure how controversial it will be. You can probably do it yourself. --BDD (talk) 17:06, 1 April 2013 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

CentropomidaeCentropomus – Being that family is monogeneric, article should be under genus name as any information regarding the family is also attributable to the species. Divingpetrel (talk) 19:42, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Since these are two separate articles if this is moved the existing article currently at the proposed target will need to be moved as well.--64.229.164.74 (talk) 00:05, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose and speedy procedural close this is a merger request. Please use WP:PM to propose mergers. -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 01:08, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Centropomidae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:40, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]