Talk:Cerro Azul (Chile volcano)/GA1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 17:17, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Initial comments[edit]

A fairly short article that appears to be well-referenced and fairly comprehensive in scope. I will now start the indepth review. Pyrotec (talk) 07:55, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

  • Geography and geology -
  • Appears to be compliant.
  • Eruptive history -
  • Appears to be compliant in respect of WP:verify.
  • The Smithsonian ref in the bibliography mentions that the last activity was in 1967 (and its also in the Info box); but it is not mentioned in this section of the article.
Yes it is, see the eruptive history paragraph.
Sorry, I've read that paragraph at least three times and I did not see it until now. Pyrotec (talk) 18:36, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
  • Possibly a bit on the short side, but for an article of this length it is reasonably. I would suggest a brief comment that it last erupted in 1967.
Done.

Pyrotec (talk) 14:45, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Summary[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Congratulations on the quality of the article: I'm awarding GA-status. Pyrotec (talk) 18:39, 28 September 2009 (UTC)