Talk:Chaps

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive[edit]

Archive of old discussions created July 15, 2008. All past discussions as of this date have been moved to the archive. Start new discussions below.

Sources[edit]

I believe the artikle needs some research. 1. You state that Armas means (shield!)as far as I know it means "You Arm" http://freetranslation.com spanish-english The style described as being attached too the saddle is the kind used in the provences of Jujuy and de Salta Arentina. 2. Bat wing chaps have been used for a very long time in the south west, the reason being not just for simplisity and ventilation, but also as protection for snake bite! much as women of the south west wore long skirts. Ryttar Sept. 19 2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryttar (talk • contribs) 14:46, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ryttar, The article is actually extensively researched, as you might see from all the footnotes, though of course there is always room for more! Where sourced, the citations are accurate to the source. For Armas, the translation is what the source says it means--it's not impossible that Western Horseman had a bad translation, but it's usually a very reliable source on this sort of thing, and it IS what they said. (also, "arm" can refer to weaponry, not anatomy) If you have sourcing for other information, feel free to add references. However, chaps in general are not protection from snakebite, BOOTS are the primary protection from snakebite (snakes, as a rule, being on the ground, even when a large rattler strikes, do not easily reach a mounter rider, after all, and cowboys didn't walk if they could ride! ;-) ) And batwings, as opposed to the shotgun design, are open in the back, so I suppose a walking cowboy COULD, in theory be bitten in the back calf in batwings, which couldn't happen with shotguns... (grin) But at any rate, if you find research sources that can improve the article, feel welcome to let us know. Montanabw(talk) 02:35, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bot report : Found duplicate references ![edit]

In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :)

  • "DARE" :
    • Cassidy, Frederic G., ed. Dictionary of American Regional English, vol. I. Cambridge/London:Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1985 ISBN 0-674-20511-1 (vol I)
    • Cassidy, Frederic G., ed. ''Dictionary of American Regional English'', vol. I. Cambridge/London:Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1985 ISBN 0-674-20511-1 (vol I)

DumZiBoT (talk) 19:02, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Chaps. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:32, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chaps. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:39, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chaps for the working horses?[edit]

Horses would also be vulnerable to damage from the chaparral or mesquite. Was there ever any protection for them? 74.127.200.185 (talk) 12:02, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Chaps&oldid=1200788822"