Jump to content

Talk:Charles Frederick Field

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Can anyone say what the basis is for the assertion that Field was the son of a Publican from Chelsea. After searching hard, I can find no basis for this, aside from unattributed comments on the internet.Bkesselman (talk) 18:21, 20 February 2014 (UTC) The best record which shows the possibility that Field may have been the son of a publican is that he might have been the son of a John Field of the Earl of Howard's Head in Chelsea. In which case he was born in 1803 rather than 1805. This can be found by searching baptismal records for 1803.Bkesselman (talk) 18:34, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charles Frederick Field. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:58, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]