Talk:Charles Radbourn

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Former good article Charles Radbourn was one of the Sports and recreation good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
February 13, 2011 Good article nominee Listed
February 15, 2011 Good article reassessment Delisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Question[edit]

How did this version of the article get listed as a GA? It's not even close, in my opinion. - PM800 (talk) 07:34, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

GA Reassessment[edit]

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Charles Radbourn/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

This was clearly nominated and quickly passed by vandals.Neonblak talk - 01:40, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

I went and undid the GA listing. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 18:38, 15 February 2011 (UTC)