This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
A fact from Charomskiy ACh-30 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 October 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
I have fixed the explanation of the motorjet setup, as it was incorrect. A motorjet is a jet engine with a compressor driven by a separate piston engine (instead of a turbine powered by the jet engines own exhaust stream as in a turbojet...hence the "turbo" part). The existing sentence said that the compressor was "driven by the turbochargers of a separate piston engine", which is obviously not logical....what does the piston engine itself power then? Perhaps the person who wrote that was confused with a turbo-compound engine, where there is a small turbine that extracts some of the waste energy from the exhaust and returns it the the crankshaft of the piston engine itself...a power-recovery device, in other words. Even on motorjet aircraft designs that powered a conventional propeller the engine itself also powered the compressor...an exhaust driven turbine could not be powerful enough to power any useful sized compressor. A jet engine needs a lot more air, compressed a lot more, than a turbocharged engine takes. Waste exhaust from a piston engine could not supply that kind of energy (unless you were using a very large engine and turbine)..45Colt 21:25, 9 February 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by .45Colt (talk • contribs)
The exact quote is: "The jet engine compressor was driven by the turbines of turbo-superchargers."--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:17, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
.png)
.svg)
