Talk:Chemical evolution

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Disambiguation
WikiProject icon This page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.
Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on December 29, 2006. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.


Moved this external link here:

The very first link about a scientific concept shouldn't come from ID, a position that has not much widespread scientific acceptance. If further links from the mainstream scientific community are added first, and in such numbers that reflect the balance of views on evolution amongst scientists, I would not object to this link being restored. As it is, it isn't very NPOV to leave it in the article as ID is very much a minority position. --Lexor|Talk 05:57, Jan 8, 2005 (UTC)

I don't like them, either, but I added it because I thought it was a good article. (And because I hoped it would get some similarly good articles from the mainstream views added.) - Omegatron 06:27, Jan 8, 2005 (UTC)
Alright, it's not the first link now... --Emuroms 20:33, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

With all due respect, I fail to see what relevence anything coming from the Intelligent Design community (especially an article rife with misinformation) could possibly have to this page.

because chemical evolution is a term they invented. non-living matter does not "evolve" and no one claims it would. they however insist on that this is what serious scientists state (due to their lack of intelligence) —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 13:22, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Separate Articles?[edit]

The concepts are clearly different, so there should be two articles. As it stands, this article is really just a disambiguation page with no underlying articles, so the discussion is moot. I do not have the expertise to contribute any more at this stage. DCDuring 04:21, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

I agree this should be done. All information about chemical evolution is covered by Abiogenesis already. --Sulai (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 16:19, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Agree. HrafnTalkStalk 16:09, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

I've converted this to a disambiguation page. HrafnTalkStalk 06:13, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Chemical evolution/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Last edited at 20:53, 24 August 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 19:51, 1 May 2016 (UTC)