Talk:Chemical imaging

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


A discussion of new techniques is an important part of the process of developing both the technique and its novel applications. This entry needs additional in line references to substantiate claims and also illustrate the state-of-the-science.Nu 18:10, 25 April 2009 (UTC)Bci2Nu 18:10, 25 April 2009 (UTC)25 April, 2009, 1:11 PM (UCT):{{ WP-PHYS}}

Further Reading Section[edit]

It seems to me that this section needs to go. Wikipedia is not meant to be a list of papers on a given topic. Do all of these papers REALLY contribute to the article? This list is longer than the article itself. While I appreciate the effort it took to put this list together, I don't think it should be. - (talk) 20:17, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chemical imaging. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required on behalf of editors regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification, as with any edit, using the archive tools per instructions below. This message updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 1 May 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:42, 4 August 2017 (UTC)