Talk:Chess960 numbering scheme

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Chess (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chess, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chess on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 07:56, 10 November 2007 (UTC)


The article needs to be moved/renamed. "Enumbering" is not a word. There is numbering and there is enumerate, but not "enumbering". It needs to be numbering. Bubba73 (talk), 18:11, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done. Bubba73 (talk), 14:42, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Vague strategy in "Direct Derivation"[edit]

The strategy in Direct Derivation is vague. It is not apparent whether after each step one is to use the number obtained from the division or the remainder in subsequent steps. I assume it is the result of the division. If this is indeed the case it should be explicitly stated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 23:25, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Chess960 numbering scheme. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Question? Archived sources still need to be checked

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:04, 29 February 2016 (UTC)