From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Chess (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chess, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chess on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Websites / Computing   
WikiProject icon This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.


It's back from the dead! I'm so happy! My first logged-in edit ever was to this article, more than two years ago. Shalom (HelloPeace) 05:03, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

In the meantime, the article got deleted and recently came back from the dead! Bubba73 (talk), 05:05, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

For profit?[edit]

What is type of company/organization is For-profit? Non-profit organization? Something else? Peter Ballard (talk) 00:51, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Separate page for each game[edit]

As for now, the following can be read under section "Database": "Each game on is hosted on a separate web page to allow internal and external weblinks to that particular game."

Although I understand the idea and I can see how someone could be led to believe this, this is actually false. This is called server-side scripting. Basically, there is only one page -- under /perl/chessgame/ -- which requires a game ID as an argument that is relayed to the web server, interpreted by the perl interpreter, and rendered properly when ready to be sent to the user.

Ultimately, this means that there is only one page, and that this page is rendered differently every time an argument (a game ID in this case) is given.

What is true about this, though, is that along with every game in their database there is a table or a different database altogether that is used to properly stock kibitzes (and whatever needs to be stocked and that is specific for each game).

So basically here's how it goes: on the server, there is a database, which contains 1) the games, and 2) the kibitzes for each game. When a request is sent to the web server, the server fetches the right game along with its kibitzes, renders the webpage properly using the perl interpreter, and sends it back to the HTTP server, which is then viewed by the user "as is".

Thus, only one page for all games.

Seigneur101 (talk) 15:33, 30 August 2009 (UTC)


This article thoroughly deserves deletion. I cannot see a single reference to an independent reliable source. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:55, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

The reftag in the heading is inaccurate; there are indeed sources, but as stated, none of them independent of the site itself. Hushpuckena (talk) 04:29, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
The article was the subject of an AFD in April 2015. I agree it has no secondary sources worthy of the name but it had 3 votes for retention including mine -based on wp:IAR -on the grounds that we need a description of a website used as a reference in hundreds of chess articles on Wikipedia. I don't expect the secondary reference situation to improve but the site's real significance is the large database of master games which can be independently verified albeit with difficulty from a few thousand books. In short, the encyclopedia would be poorer without it. JRPG (talk) 15:20, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
The chesscafe article I linked to is at least a secondary reliable source, even if the coverage was negative. MaxBrowne (talk) 10:21, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:47, 29 March 2016 (UTC)