From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Former good article nominee Chimpanzee was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
September 4, 2010 Good article nominee Not listed

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chimpanzee. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:45, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Misleading! Either make this a "chimp & bonobo" page, or disentangle[edit]

The confusion goes on. I'll repeat this until smb. starts discussing it.Arminden (talk) 22:56, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

The page should definitely be renamed Pan (Genus) as to avoid confusion with the actual Chimpanzee page, Common chimpanzee (which is where searching for Chimpanzee should actually link to). It seems to already be serving the function as a page for the genus, so a rename only makes sense. Kyle Tatum (talk) 16:08, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Agreed, I'll try to move the page and see if someone stops me. Shame, the page is move protected. ScienceDawns (talk) 07:15, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
I can't see this being moved - we always use the name that is in most common use, and that is definitely "chimpanzee" over Pan. However, the lede needs to make clear from the very start that this is about the genus and not the common chimpanzee, so some clarification is welcome. I've given it a further shot. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 07:49, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

mature more proprtionally[edit]

section: chimpanzees as pets, "chimpanzees physically mature a lot more proportionally than do human beings" needs clarification. i guess it was meant to say they grow FASTER and become stronger than humans. the expression "a lot more proportionally" rather means the opposite of that, if it has any meaning at all. "more proportionally" is not mentioned in the source either (on the contrary it says they adolesce by the age of 6-8 years and become too strong by this age to be controlled by human force). therefore i suggest removing the misleading word "proportionally" and replace it with something more straightforward like, "faster and stronger". (talk) 10:58, 23 October 2016 (UTC).


The article reads: "Chimps live about 33 years for males, 37 years for female, in the wild". This is sourced to Baker (2000), but that article actually gives those numbers as maximum ages at Gombe, not typical ages as we are implying. (talk) 18:30, 18 February 2017 (UTC)