This article was nominated for deletion on 6 June 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women artistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women artistsTemplate:WikiProject Women artistsWomen artists articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Somehow, Christy was once described as a "digital photographer". She's just a photographer so there is no need to describe her as a "digital photographer". I took out the word "digital" but someone put it back! How can I make sure it stays out? Setomorp (talk) 23:35, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, it is very difficult to find any original & tertiary sources to add to this article, as most are photo blogs and magazine blurbs. Less than a handful have original content (rather than repetitive blurbs), and as far as I can tell, there is very little in the way of verifiable content regarding the nature of her "technique". In years past, based on these factors alone, the article would never have survived AfD (deletion discussion), so I find it rather incredible that you have complaints. We have a lot of policies and guidelines, and if you have any issues with them, you may wish to consider that even though Rogers appears to be a member of the Church of Scientology[1], due to the high level of sourcing standards here, we cannot even insert that fact because the website in question is not accepted as reliable or verifiable. You may wish to read this as well: Wikipedia:An article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing.Laval (talk) 22:47, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You may wish to find a secondary or tertiary source regarding the Angers Nantes Opera, because the existence of her images on their website is not enough by our standards -- even a statement from the opera will do (but not any press releases from the artist themselves). Otherwise, editors are well within their rights to remove that as well as anything they don't consider holds up to our standards. Like Scientology, we Wikipedians place a great emphasis upon standards and the standard application of guidelines and policy. Laval (talk) 22:51, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Considering that we don't yet have any verifiable or reliable sources to document this artist's personal life and her religious beliefs, if anyone does know of any such sources, and if she is a "Scientology celebrity" of note, please bring them to the table here for discussion. Please remember that we can only use absolutely reliable and verifiable sources in order to conform to the stringent standards of WP:BLP. Laval (talk) 22:55, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
In addition to this Scientology thing, we also need verifiable data on her date & place of birth, academic career (if it exists), etc. Laval (talk) 22:59, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:LEAD, the first section should summarize the article and be 4 paragraphs long. There seems to be alot of material that should be in the body of the article, and not in the lead. --Malerooster (talk) 21:48, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
