Talk:Chromolithography

Pop culture reference?[edit]

Is there any way (or any need) to note the remark Cary Grant makes in North by Northwest, in the auction scene, when he loudly expresses his disbelief at a bid for a painting by shouting, "For that chromo?" --Wspencer11 (talk to me...) 14:40, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Halftone?[edit]

Did they use halftone? If not what did they do instead?--Hhielscher (talk) 01:26, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear![edit]

The article is somewhat impenetrable to the novice. As far as I can tell, the printing surfaces are painted with crayons, which somehow contain enough pigments to make multiple prints. How many? What sort of crayon can result in multiple deep colors applied to multiple sheets? What purpose is actually served by the use of gum and acid?

In the examples of single-prints, what aesthetic argument was made for their superiority over the simpler method of painting directly on the (final canvas or fine-arts paper) surfaces by master painters? Mydogtrouble (talk) 14:55, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article is in dire need of a re-write - is there a flag for this ? It is unclear in the extreme.

Julius Bien[edit]

An American lithographic printer and cartographer, he is generally referred to as a "pioneer of Chromolithography" and is known for maps and the Bien Edition of Audobon's Birds of America. I am tempted to add him, but the only good source online seems to be a blog -- seemingly reliable site, but a "blog" nonetheless [1]. ~E 74.60.29.141 (talk) 22:18, 30 September 2012 (UTC) There is also a brief bio, attributed to "Peters" (?) here: http://www.mapsofpa.com/the1900atlas.htm ~E 74.60.29.141 (talk) 22:25, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Peters" probably refers to:

Peters, Harry T.; America on Stone: The Other Printmakers to the American People (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, Doran, 1931); facsimile reprint of 1931 edition published by Arno Press, 1976

~E 22:37, 30 September 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.60.29.141 (talk)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chromolithography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:23, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Opposition?[edit]

This section should be removed, as it appears to derive from a single article, that is, it's that guy's point of view, but there's nothing in particular to back it up, beyond his original research. Theonemacduff (talk) 21:46, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oleograph[edit]

Oleograph redirects here but isn't used in the article. At present a reader who searches for it is given no indication of what an oleograph is. Can a definition be added to this article to avoid confusion? – Arms & Hearts (talk) 20:40, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]