Talk:Ciright Systems

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Advertisement?[edit]

I don't think this page needs a re-write, just a few edits. I deleted a lot of the sales-pitch like language the author had added and tried to make it more neutral. Changed outline title from "Features" to "Product Specifications." I also added a reference to support the claims about C Programming and reliable interfaces, to show that this is a supported fact and not a matter of opinion or attempt at promotion. Are those without a background in programming able to understand it, or does anyone think it should be edited for that too? Rachael erin (talk) 20:07, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • I don't think this is written like an advertisement, at least not any more. I've compared it to other articles about technology companies and it seems to be pretty similar. Appenzel (talk) 19:23, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Major changes have been made since the page was tagged as an advertisement. A lot of material from the website that was included for extra information was removed as it could be perceived as promotional in nature. This includes the product specifications and technologies. Anyone have any ideas improve this article so hopefully an admin will remove the advert tag? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by GPfeiffer (talkcontribs) 16:08, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Newcomer to Wikipedia[edit]

This was my first experience with adding an article to Wikipedia.... I first learned of Ciright years ago, when I was studying Entrepreneurship at the Wharton School in Philly. I have kept in contact with the founder of Ciright over the years (who is a serial entrepreneur), and followed the development of its cloud computing platform. My enthusiasm for the company's product and for its long devotion to handheld device business programs apparently came through to sound too much like advertising in the article I posted on the company! I will return to edit the article and confine my comments to just the facts! GPfeiffer (talk) 15:26, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I edited my entry on Ciright to remove all the enthusiastic language, and replaced it with fact-based, verifiable phrasing....this is now more in the spirit of what a Wikipedia entry should be like! Thanks for your feedback! —Preceding unsigned comment added by GPfeiffer (talkcontribs) 01:27, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ciright Systems. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:29, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ciright Systems. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:12, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]