Talk:Citizens for Tax Justice

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taxation, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.TaxationWikipedia:WikiProject TaxationTemplate:WikiProject TaxationTaxation articles

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Is this article NPOV? I think it sounds like it was written by someone who is antagonistic towards them; does anyone else think so? At any rate, I think it could be written a lot better, but I'm probably too biased the other way to successfully do it.Shanoman (talk) 20:34, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. It starts off by immediately calling the group "liberal" and refers you to two newspaper web pages in which also simply tack on that label. Looking at the actual organization's website, it does not describe itself as liberal. I did not do an exhaustive search, but I could not even find an instance of the word "liberal" on the organization's web site. Mason1024 (talk) 19:55, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So? Neither does the Heritage Foundation describe itself as conservative on its website (AFAIK). Why would such an organization willingly paint itself as being biased? KGill _{talk email} 18:04, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV Sept, 2010[edit]

I've added the NPOV tag to the page. The article has problems with POV and style: "President Ronald Regan had an epiphany," etc. Not that Reagan didn't have epiphanies, it's just, you know, terrible writing.JRNorbergé (talk) 13:46, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article is one giant advertisement for a lobbying group[edit]

The article has multiple issues, and has been tagged as such. Further, there are clearly those patrolling the article to make sure the issues remain. Key issues are POV, Advert, essaylike. Problems include, but are not limited to:

The introduction blatantly advocates political positions
Weasel words are used throughout
External links violate Wikipedia policy, directing users to advertising
The article is amazingly one sided in support of the lobbying group

I have tagged the article. Removal of the tags without modification to correct these blatant policy violations will be reported on the appropriate administrators notice board. Sfcardwell (talk) 03:55, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed[edit]

All of history and points now backed up with sources and fixed up from previous state. Work in progress.

Also, removed external links as per previously mentioned violation.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.163.195.247 (talk) 16:57, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Citizens for Tax Justice. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081122230358/http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/polisci/faculty/groseclose/Media.Bias.8.htm to http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/polisci/faculty/groseclose/Media.Bias.8.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:56, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]