Talk:City of Sydney Relationships Declaration

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Australia / Sydney (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon City of Sydney Relationships Declaration is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Sydney (marked as Low-importance).
Note icon
Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia.
Note icon
The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to for other than editorial assistance.


The article contains the comment "Financial institutions use AUSTRAC's 100 point ID system. According to this system, customers have to show various forms of ID to make up the 100 points, in order to be able to prove their identity. This means you have to present your Relationships Declaration (25 points) along with other forms of ID such as your passport or Medicare card, in order to make up the 100 points required."

I do not think this is correct. Having just signed a relationship declaration this is not mentioned anywhere on the Sydney City Council literature. Also it is not clearly identified on the 100 point check form (form 201) in either sections 8, 9 or 10.

Please add page![edit]

Title says it all for the City of Melbourne Relationships Declaration. Wikipedia please add this because Melbourne also has a Relationships Declaration programe. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk) 13:41, 15 April 2007 (UTC).

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on City of Sydney Relationships Declaration. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:31, 8 August 2017 (UTC)