From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Contested deletion[edit]

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (your reason here) --Evenmadderjon (talk) 15:11, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

I think this page should not be deleted because it is a major new product from a major mover in the field of 'clinical knowledge'. While it is true that this product is new and has not as yet recieved as much press as some of its more established rivals, it has still been reported by a number of publications which indicates that it is a development that is being closely followed within the field of 'clinical knowledge'. I would especially like to point out the article on Information Week comparing it to the more established UpToDate, suggests that this is a significant development in the field. The size of the project, and the company behind it, suggests that even if the product is a complete failure, it would still be a noteworthy development within the history of clinical knowledge provision. --Evenmadderjon (talk) 15:11, 26 June 2012 (UTC)