Talk:Coca-Cola Firecracker 250

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject NASCAR (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject NASCAR, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to NASCAR. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, you can visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Florida (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida.
If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was PAGE MOVED per discussion below. -GTBacchus(talk) 22:28, 28 January 2007 (UTC)


Winn-Dixie 250 presented by PepsiCoWinn-Dixie 250 — Although the longer version is the current official name, having presenting sponsors in the title is usually pretty unwieldy (see Built Ford Tough 225 presented by Greater Cincinnati Ford Dealers). Recury 19:18, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Survey[edit]

Add  # '''Support'''  or  # '''Oppose'''  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~. Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.

Survey - in support of the move[edit]

  1. Support as nom. Recury 19:18, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
  2. Support though the first line of the article should retain the official name. Agne 19:27, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
  3. Strong support Aerobird Target locked - Fox One! 20:58, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
  4. Support using only the primary title sponsor in the article name. I agree with Agne7 that where the event's official title includes a "presented by" secondary sponsor, that should appear on the article's first line. Barno 01:21, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
  5. Support As some races seem too change their name more often than some people change their underwear, I'm all for limiting the name to just the primary sponsor. I wouldn't even mind a system where we didn't have to mention the sponsor in the title at all.Mustang6172 02:52, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
  6. Support, agree to Agne27's comment. Royalbroil T : C 05:49, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
  7. Support - no. (see Orange Bowl presented by Tostisos - or just Orange Bowl). Patstuarttalk|edits 09:27, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Survey - in opposition to the move[edit]

Discussion[edit]

Add any additional comments:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Fair use rationale for Image:Winn-Dixie 250 Logo.gif[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

Image:Winn-Dixie 250 Logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:21, 12 February 2008 (UTC)