Talk:Coming Up to Breathe/GA2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 18:12, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:


  • For the "Recorded" section, show what year it was recorded followed by a semicolon and a list of studios where it was recorded (Ex: 2009; Studio 1, Studio 2)
  • Singles do not need to be sourced in the infobox because they have their own respective articles


  • Released on April 25, 2006... "Released on April 25, 2006 by INO Records..."


  • No issues


  • Two subsections not necessary in this context

Critical reception[edit]

  • No issues


  • An album cut from the album, "No More No Less", spent one frame on the Hot Christian Songs chart, debuting and peaking at number thirty..[31] Get rid of extra period at end of statement


  • Replace all of the "No."s with "number"

Track listing[edit]

  • No issues


  • No issues

Charts and certifications[edit]

  • No issues


  • If you mention a work or publisher in a reference and it is wiki-linked, do not wiki-link it for further references
  • Only italicize publications in the "work=" parameter
  • Proofread all of these to ensure errors are not made; for a guideline to follow, use WP:REFERENCE

After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put the article on hold at this time. There are a few prose issues, and things mostly just need to be proofread in the references section for this article to pass. I will give you the general seven days to fix mistakes, address points I have made, and/or ask me any questions that you have. Rp0211 (talk2me) 18:35, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

All issues have now been addressed, so I feel confident passing this article. Congratulations and keep up the good work you are doing! Rp0211 (talk2me) 01:46, 22 June 2012 (UTC)