Talk:Comparison of AMD processors

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Why is this list so old? Brazos? Trinity? Get with the program fanboys! — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 08:01, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Computing (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.


Isn't this essentially redundant with the various other pages containing lists of AMD processors? The size of all those articles (only some of which I linked) should be some indication of just how large this page would have to become in order to be complete. — Aluvus t/c 04:26, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Could use some reader friendly editing. Not easy to look up and down the list unless you remembered all the really long columns — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 17:34, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
This article also is fairly out of date, many modern processors do not appear here whereas they do on other similar pages I agree, It should be deleted or merged with other pages you linked. Allywilson 17:16, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Agreed on this - the list here is not only out of date, it was incomplete when it was created. Also the title suggests AMD processors in general, yet this seems to be specifically Athlon series and up only. Needs to be deleted and links to it redirected to already existing and more accurate/complete articles. aelfwyne 21:33, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Agreed, I just tagged it for deletion. Wikiinger (talk) 17:11, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Dude! That comment was 10 years old! The page had been nominated for deletion because of this 9 years ago, but was kept! A LOT of editing and updating has been happening to bring this page up-to-date and to clean it up. Let's talk about this in a new section. Real tlhingan (talk) 18:14, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
The nomination for deletion suggests this page is similar to List of AMD processors, while it isn't. That page lists AMD processors, whereas this page gives very detailed specs in an apples-to-apples format.Real tlhingan (talk) 18:17, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

AMD-V on Santa Rosa chips[edit]

The Santa Rosa chips all have AMD-V, but the chart doesn't list it. I'm not familiar enough with working with charts on Wikipedia to modify it though. Would someone else mind taking care of this? Thanks in advance. Caben42 (talk) 19:59, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

some Phenom II missing[edit]

i bought a Phenom II X4 810:

this line is completly missing... — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 08:26, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Duron Spitfire[edit]

The Duron Spitfire doesn't have SSE. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 13:21, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

No comparison of AMD Fusion APUs created yet[edit]

(As per title) LittleBen (talk) 00:35, 23 August 2012 (UTC)


There are two asterisk next to the 8's that identify the maximum number of cores some bulldozer chips can have. There's no explanation for them and they're the only two asterisk found by my browser's search function. Sdmitch16 (talk) 06:00, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

6/6 Cores?[edit]

What does "6/6" in the Cores column mean? Why not simply "6"? --DrSeehas (talk) 18:51, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

754 & 939 supporting DDR2?[edit]

In Athlon 64 range it's showing Venus [both the Socket 754 & the 939] and San Diego 939 as supporting DDR2 which i'm quite sure is incorrect. I think the separating bar for memory controller should be moved down from its present location between Winchester & Venice to between San Diego & Orleans as in that range only Orleans & Lima have DDR2 support being Socket AM2 CPUs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 08:48, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

EDIT: Perhaps my above earlier comment has not been noticed or it was ignored because it was unsigned as i didn't have an account at the time. I've now checked further and it's abundantly clear that no socket 754 or 939 CPUs have a DDR2 memory controller. I have no idea how to move the separator without risking messing up the table. Someone more competent might like to do the amendment, thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dropbear087 (talkcontribs) 01:07, 27 March 2015 (UTC)