Talk:Comparison of numerical analysis software

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Software / Computing   
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.
 

Operating system[edit]

The table of operating system support was pointless as every software supported every OS except a couple that didn't have BSD support, which is very obscure. Wordsoup (talk) 18:08, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

BSD and unix support isn't that obscure for numerical software--these programs can be run on clusters and shared-time machines that may run an alternative OS. Further: this doesn't comprehensively list ALL numerical analysis programs & the table may hold even more value when some of that other software is added. --Karnesky (talk) 18:46, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
This OS table is very ambiguous. What is the point of having a Unix column without specifying which Unix is supported? Why single out BSD as it is a Unix? There are many types of Unix: System V, Version 7, OpenServer, UnixWare, AIX, Solaris, HP/UX et al. Perhaps a solution is to not specify Yes/No in the Unix column, but specify which Unix. Random thoughts: Group BSD into the Unix column. Specify which BSD is supported. Supported versions of any supported OS. Supported version of the software on a given OS version. --216.197.65.226 (talk) 19:25, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Irrelevant entry[edit]

Monkey Analytics is not a numerical analysis software. Should removed it. --Okisan (talk) 06:41, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

GSL[edit]

Shouldn't this page include GNU Scientific Library (http://www.gnu.org/software/gsl/)? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.26.0.5 (talk) 02:24, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I'll add it K.menin (talk) 06:58, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

'Development started' removed from 'Libraries' section[edit]

I think that this column have little interest given existence of 'First public release' one. It just consumes space, which can be used more efficiently, so I've replaced it with 'Language' column. K.menin (talk) 06:59, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Important Omissions in the software list[edit]

Warning: this list has very important omissions, notably in the department of modeling languages for formulating, solving and analyzing large-scale optimization problems. Among others, the following commercial software should be added to the list: AIMMS, AMPL, GAMS. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.156.62.78 (talk) 16:15, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Software vs Libraries[edit]

We have separate list of numerical analysis software and list of numerical libraries, yet both libraries and software are currently compared on this page, even though the title only mentions software. Shouldn't we have a separate page for the comparison of numerical libraries, for consistency? Cdrnet (talk) 11:22, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

R and "GUI creation support"[edit]

For R's entry, would the Tcl/Tk interface [1] mean that it does have GUI creation support? 173.13.207.65 (talk) 03:07, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Comparison of numerical analysis software. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:22, 11 August 2017 (UTC)