|Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Conduct disorder.
|WikiProject Psychology||(Rated C-class, Mid-importance)|
|WikiProject Medicine / Psychiatry||(Rated C-class, Mid-importance)|
- 1 ICD-10
- 2 Conduct disorder and Japanese 'anime' characters
- 3 Mbhutten's edits
- 4 More info
- 5 Copyright problems with diagnostic criteria
- 6 Copyright problem removed
- 7 No controversy?
- 8 Proposal to Add the Four Criteria for Conduct Disorder
- 9 Assessment and Diagnosis Sandbox Edits for Conduct Disorder
Conduct disorder is classified as F 91 in the ICD-10, not F 19.
Conduct disorder and Japanese 'anime' characters
I find it ironically funny how this article perfectly describes the usual profile of japanese comics & cartoons protagonists, "heroes" to many teenagers nowadays. Makes you wonder if we don't have a time-bomb set already with its countdown going on through the enviromental exposition to this particular entertainment. --Loborojo —Preceding comment was added at 01:45, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Mbhutten has some sort of agenda here. His added link to "myoutofcontrolteen.com" was suspicious enough, given the fact that the writing style was not what you'd expect from a credible source. I did a little digging, and here's what I found.
- Tracert pegged the source website as 'premium7.geo.yahoo7.akadns.net.'
That raised a couple red flags for me, so I checked a WHOIS database for the domain 'myoutofcontrolteen.com,' and here is what I found:
Domain Name.......... myoutofcontrolteen.com
Creation Date........ 2006-03-05 Registration Date.... 2006-03-05 Expiry Date.......... 2008-03-05 Organisation Name.... mark huttenlocker Organisation Address. 231 N. East St. Organisation Address. Organisation Address. Pendleton Organisation Address. 46064 Organisation Address. IN Organisation Address. UNITED STATES
Admin Name........... mark huttenlocker
Admin Address........ 231 N. East St. Admin Address........ Admin Address........ Pendleton Admin Address........ 46064 Admin Address........ IN Admin Address........ UNITED STATES Admin Email.......... firstname.lastname@example.org Admin Phone.......... +1.7657788707 Admin Fax............
Tech Name............ YahooDomains TechContact
Tech Address......... 701 First Ave. Tech Address......... Tech Address......... Sunnyvale Tech Address......... 94089 Tech Address......... CA Tech Address......... UNITED STATES Tech Email........... domain.tech@YAHOO-INC.COM Tech Phone........... +1.6198813096 Tech Fax............. Name Server.......... yns1.yahoo.com Name Server.......... yns2.yahoo.com
- Mark Hutten is indeed a MA, as stated on the site (Google confirms), but I'm just not sure about it. For now, I reverted Mbhutten's edits (I forgot to login before reverting), but if anyone wants to ask me about it, feel free. --HubHikari 15:15, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
It would be nice if someone could find info on the likelihood of a child transitioning to antisocial personality disorder (is it in the DSM?). I seem to recall that many children grow out of it, but not sure enough to make the edit. Jankow28 (talk) 13:17, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
The average child with ODD is more likely to transition into a diagnosis for a personality disorder than the average child. Although many may "grow out of it," I think the more critical piece is that compared to the general population they are more likely to not do so. However to add a little more information... the type of conduct disoder plays into this as well... those with adolescent onset are less likely than those with childhood onset to develop into a diagnosis for ASPD. Here's a quick reference... http://www.crescentlife.com/disorders/conduct%20disorders.htm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) 19:55, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
Copyright problems with diagnostic criteria
The American Psychiatric Association has not released its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders into public domain, but claims copyright. The Wikimedia Foundation has received a letter of complaint (Ticket:2010030910040817, for those with access) about the use of their diagnostic criteria in this and a number of other articles. Currently, this content is blanked pending investigation, which will last approximately one week. Please feel free to provide input at the copyright problems board listing during that time. Individuals with access to the books would be particularly welcome in helping to conduct the investigation. Assistance developing a plan to prevent misuse of the APA's material on Wikipedia projects would also be welcome. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:03, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
Copyright problem removed
One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:31, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
This topic (which I just stumbled upon) seems to be the sort for which you would expect to see the usual "medicalization of ordinary differences in human behavior" controversy, particularly given the vagueness with which it is described. Also, the description of the fMRI study should report, at a minimum, the size of the study population. Many such studies have very small or very restricted subject groups, so this information is highly relevant to understanding the validity of the study. Finally, if a source can be found, an estimate of the frequency of this diagnosis in the overall population would be valuable. 121a0012 (talk) 06:37, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
- Why would anyone think that the kind of severe antisocial behaviour shown by people who have conduct disorder is ordinary? If it is not stopped, the people who have it typically develop antisocial personality disorder. Jim Michael (talk) 18:23, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Proposal to Add the Four Criteria for Conduct Disorder
Assessment and Diagnosis Sandbox Edits for Conduct Disorder
Hello all, I have made changes in my Sandbox about this topic focusing on evidence-based assessment and diagnosis. It would be great if people would look at it and leave comments on my talk page before I post it on the article.
The sandbox link can be found here (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ergunner/sandbox).