Talk:Conflict-of-interest editing on Wikipedia
|This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to . If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.|
|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Conflict-of-interest editing on Wikipedia article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
|Archives: 1, 2|
|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
|Text and/or other creative content from this version of Conflict of interest editing on Wikipedia was copied or moved into List of Wikipedia controversies with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. The former page's talk page can be accessed at Talk:Conflict of interest editing on Wikipedia.|
|This article has been mentioned by a media organization:|
Is picture of Andrew Leonard appropriate
The top of this article contains a picture of Andrew Leonard. Neither the caption nor the article text explains how Leonard relates to conflict-of-interest editing on Wikipedia. Should that be spelled out in the caption and article, or should his picture be removed? Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 18:16, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
- That's a very good question. Mr. Leonard once wrote an article in Salon on the subject. But that's no reason he should be the poster boy for COI editing. Probably best to delete the picture. John Nagle (talk) 19:31, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Conflict-of-interest editing on Wikipedia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.lowellsun.com/ci_3444567
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at
You may set the
|checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting
|needhelp= to your help request.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
If you are unable to use these tools, you may set
|needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.
Biggleswiki statement unclear
Quoth the article (Conflict-of-interest editing on Wikipedia#Bell_Pottinger):
- One of the most noted accounts was registered under the name "Biggleswiki" (an internal Wikipedia investigation resulted in several such cases).
Wikiblame suggests the parenthetical statement was added in the same edit as its surrounding content almost four years ago. I was wondering if anyone could clear it up, since I don't think MediaWiki supports "several such cases" of accounts "registered under the name 'Biggleswiki'" or any other non-unique name for that matter. Mattman00000 (talk) 05:59, 29 June 2016 (UTC)