Talk:Connecticut gubernatorial election, 2010

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Connecticut (Rated C-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Elections and Referendums (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 

Ned Lamont exploratory[edit]

I'm just thinking someone should add to the "Potential Democratic candidates" section, that (D)Ned Lamont started an exploratory campaign for Governor, at the start of November. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.32.25.198 (talk) 18:40, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Fedele pic[edit]

The state of CT official web site has a pic of Fedele: http://www.ct.gov/ltgovmfedele/cwp/view.asp?A=2844&Q=331368 and this must be in the public domain, isn't it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.23.252.158 (talk) 00:19, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Just because an image is found on a state government website doesn’t mean that it is in the public domain. Unless there is a notice accompanying the image that expressly states that the image is in the public domain or freely licensed (or one which covers the entire website), it has to be assumed that the image probably isn’t. Sgt. R.K. Blue (talk) 05:00, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Threshold for serious candidates[edit]

What is the acceptable threshold to be listed as a candidate for Governor? Someone recently added "Steven Daunis" as a potential Democratic candidate. It seems quite possible that Daunis himself added the link. This strikes me as possible self promotion, and also a violation of the "Links normally to be avoided" guidelines, as the link points to a personal blog. But the real question goes to the standards to be used here. I could claim I'm a potential candidate for Governor, that goes for any CT resident who meets the basic eligibility criteria. But just because any man/woman on the street says they're thinking about running for Governor, does that qualify them to be listed as a potential candidate? By that standard, the list could quickly balloon to hundreds of names. --MikeUMA (talk) 01:53, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

I have spent a few minutes searching for information on this man, and so far the only information I can find about his gubernatorial candidacy besides his personal blog was a comment that he (or someone posing as him) posted on a ctnews.com article. Additionally, if you go to Steven Daunis’ blog, there is no sort of notification at the bottom of the page to indicate who paid for the website. Go to the website of any “real” candidate (such as Tom Foley or Dan Malloy) and they have these notices. It’s certainly possible that Daunis wants to run for governor, but perhaps he just doesn’t understand that there is paperwork involved with officially filing a candidacy. Regardless, I would say that he has not met the threshold to be included among a list of serious candidates, at least not at present. Sgt. R.K. Blue (talk) 04:23, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
Agreed. He has been removed, at least until reliably sourced information on his candidacy surfaces, if it ever does.--JayJasper (talk) 18:03, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Bridgeport chaos[edit]

This article is going to have to get into the insanity caused by the broken polling machines and inadequate number of voting forms in Bridgeport. Sadly, it's not just a parenthetical detail, it's going to affect how the election plays out, what with both political parties already threatening lawsuits and results challenges. Minaker (talk) 15:32, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Agree This has the same implications as the chaos caused by Florida during the 2000 Presidential Election. The election is currently too close to call with the Republican slightly in the lead. The City of Bridgeport is heavily Democrat and will probably put Dan Malloy over the top. This will most likely lead to lawsuits by Tom Foley and his team. I'll scour the local media websites and see what I can put together as a start, but I welcome others to add. Hobbamock (talk) 17:02, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:DanMalloy2010.jpg[edit]

The image File:DanMalloy2010.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --06:53, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Connecticut gubernatorial election, 2010. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required on behalf of editors regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification, as with any edit, using the archive tools per instructions below. This message updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 1 May 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:02, 12 August 2017 (UTC)