|WikiProject Oregon||(Rated Stub-class, Mid-importance)|
Thanks for starting this, VT. I noticed the redirect from Connectipedia doesn't work so well, which I assume has to do with the plus symbol. Should we maybe move the article to Connectipedia, and redirect in the other direction? Not sure what the manual of style has to say about stuff like this, but I think the standard English alphabet spelling is preferred. -Pete (talk) 01:30, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
- Good suggestion, I didn't realize the redirect was broken. I'll switch them now. VanTucky 18:16, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
I feel like the tone of this section isn't particularly appropriate to the Wikipedia style. Rather than talking about inspiration, what's more vital to a history of the project is the nuts and bolts of how it got started. Trying to fit with our totally neutral tone, we try and steer clear of subjective language like "community spirit and passion", it being a clear value judgment about Meyer and the project. I'd love to keep it in an altered form, but it's just too close to the contents of Connectipedia.org right now, from my perspective as an encyclopedist. VanTucky 21:58, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, yes, very much agreed. Working with what we have as approved language and moving that to appropriate language for wikipedia. I appreciate your comments! User:Amy Sample Ward —Preceding comment was added at 23:50, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
- MediaWiki is the wiki engine for many notable websites, and has significant coverage online from WP:RS, but I can't find any significant coverage for Wagn outside of its use on Connectipedia. A few editors have just resurrected the article, but I'd like to propose merging the new content back here, as I can't see any evidence of yet of notability per WP:GNG. Captain Conundrum (talk) 10:16, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
my two pence
+1 to Captain Conundrum.
WAGN is a piece of software to build wikis, Connectipedia is one wiki built with that technology, there's the same difference as between Napoleon and Man (or mediawiki, and Wikipedia). I would just double link the two!
- Connectipedia is built on top of WAGN
- Wagn has a few implementation, most notably — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2620:0:105F:0:B6B5:2FFF:FECC:8346 (talk) 13:04, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Connectipedia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080827162703/http://www.connectipedia.org/ to http://connectipedia.org/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
You may set the
|checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting
|needhelp= to your help request.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
If you are unable to use these tools, you may set
|needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.