Talk:Constitution of Venezuela

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Politics (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Venezuela (Rated Start-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Venezuela, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Venezuela on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Untitled[edit]

Suggestion: Was there a constitution previous to this one, and how are they different? AdamRetchless 13:13, 23 August 2005 (UTC)


Yes, there was a constitution made in 1961.

The main article reads: "National Constituent Assembly convened by President Hugo Chávez"

"Convened" does not really explain what happened in 1999. Chávez won elections in 98 in compliance to the old constitution, and his electoral promise was to call for a referendum asking the people if they wanted to celebrate a National Constituent Assembly, so his very first decree as new president was to have a referendum asking people this.

After the people approved to have a Constituent Assembly with originary powers (this means that it must not subordinate to any of the established institutions), elections were held to choose the people integrating this Constituent National Assembly, then they later debated among themselves and held public debates asking suggestions to all sectors of society of how a new constitution should be. After mostly a year of work, the draft was finished and then, was presented for approval, again doing a referendum.

This article: History of Constitutional Reform, by Gregory Wilpert, explains this with more details. It also describes some of the differences with the constitution of 1961.

You may compare the differences by reading both documents:


'Bolivarian-Marxist'[edit]

The Constition was 'Bolivarian-Marxist'? How about Socialist?

Is there a reliable source for that claim? Danotto94 (talk) 03:39, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Removal of boycott[edit]

JRSP, what was the problem with this? Does it need another source, or is the number wrong? I thought it was accurate? Sandy 12:15, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Opposition was calling to vote "no", there were no boycott from main opp groups. Results were not controversial, I don't know of any significant group challenging the legitimacy of the constitution JRSP 12:53, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Guayana Esequiba dispute[edit]

Does anyone know what the constitution says with regard to Venezuela's national boundaries? My understanding is that Venezuela claims over half of Guyana in what it calls "Guayana Esequiba." Historically Venezuela has regarded Guayana Esequiba as a state occupied illegally by Guyana. It would be interesting to note if the new constitution maintains this claim.72.198.79.196 (talk) 01:38, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Has anyone figured this out? Danotto94 (talk) 03:37, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Historical Information[edit]

Are there articles regarding the past constitutions of Venezuela? If not, should there be a history section in this article giving a summary of those constitutions? If so, should there be wikilinks to those articles on this article page, possibly in the see also section?--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 15:03, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Legislature[edit]

"Marginalized" seems POV. Is there a less pejorative term? 86.159.35.255 (talk) 02:20, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Removal of venezuelaanalysis.com as a source[edit]

I was told it's an opinion blog that shouldn't be used in Wiki. @Ian.thomson: should I look for other sources or just remove mentions of the site? Danotto94 (talk) 03:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

The particular article you were citing was an opinion piece. I said "The Venezuelaanalysis.com article is clearly labelled as an opinion piece, and the views in it should be presented as such if they are included at all," in reference to the article you were citing at Venezuela. I did not say that the whole site is an opinion blog, and I did not say that the site cannot be used on Wikipedia. Ian.thomson (talk) 03:42, 13 April 2015 (UTC)