Talk:Cook's Illustrated

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Food and drink Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Untitled[edit]

I'm a big fan of Cook's so I decided to take on this stub and add some content. I've divided this into preliminary sections which basically mirror the magazine. I know that (a lot) more needs to be done, but it's a start! Superbeecat 08:26, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How long?[edit]

How long has the magazine been around? That seems like pertinent info that should be in this article. 66.251.84.28 17:48, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed the above sentence from "How long has the magazine been around for?" to "How long has the magazine been around?" Always good to help each other out with our English. :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.211.251.118 (talk • contribs)

Web subscribers[edit]

The article states both that the website has 150,000 and 300,000 subscribers. Which is it? Patricia Meadows (talk) 17:10, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Appropriate references?[edit]

I notice that the two references for the subscription trouble (7 and 8) are links to posts on two Q/A forums. (and one link is dead now to boot) I don't write for wikipedia or anything, but it seems to me that a forum thread is not really suitable as a proper reference for something. When I look at the references for other pages, I'm wanting to see links to articles and news pages and things that have been published. Some people complaining on a forum doesn't really serve to properly back up a statement, in my mind. Is this standard wikipedia practice? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.72.202.157 (talk) 02:58, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Criticisms section needs to be impartial[edit]

As it is currently written, the Criticism section contains a number of opinions, such as "This seems to fall under fair use ..." Can it be rewritten to state the facts without straying across the line into personal opinion? --Gronk Oz (talk) 15:21, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This section also has some grammar/spelling issues. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.233.63.81 (talk) 12:41, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]