Talk:Coronary care unit

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Medicine (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Another nice one is PMID 10588193, but I have no access to the fulltext here. JFW | T@lk 17:45, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

I'm a bit puzzled about your lack of access to the full text since it does not appear to be protected by subscription. Click on your PMID 10588193 link and on the new page you should see a box with gold and grey writing "ELSEVIER FULL-TEXT-ARTICLE". Clicking this gets the Science Direct HTML format of the full article. You can directly link to this Science Direct article. If you look at the top left-hand-side of the page, you should see a hyperlink beginning "doi:". Right-click on this and choose "Copy Shortcut" or "Copy Link Location" (depending on your browser). That link is permanent enough for inclusion in Wikipedia if you wish, though I think the PMID link is fine. You may also choose to view a PDF that looks very much like how the article would appear in the journal. Click the PDF link on the top right-hand-side of the Science Direct page. Apologies if you already knew all this. --Colin 11:21, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

I must have been too tired. Reading it now. JFW | T@lk 14:13, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Coronary care unit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:09, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Editorial about history[edit]

doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.05.022 JFW | T@lk 13:40, 25 August 2017 (UTC)