Talk:Countess Claudine Rhédey de Kis-Rhéde

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Countess?[edit]

Shouldn't the article be called Countess Claudine Rhédey von Kis-Rhéde so as to include her title before marriage? I'll move it in a few days if no one objects. Ruby2010 (talk) 05:49, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Moving it now. Ruby2010 (talk) 17:50, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vlad the Monk[edit]

The line of descent from Vlad II to Prince Charles through Vlad The Monk (Vlad the Impaler's half-brother):

Vlad II ---> Vlad the Monk ---> Radu IV ---> Mircea III ---> Stanca Basarab ---> Zamphira Logo de Szazsebes ---> Adam Racz de Galgo ---> Peter Racz de Galgo ---> Christina Racz de Galgo ---> Catherine Kuun de Osdola ---> Baroness Agnes Kendeffy de Malmoviz ---> Baron Gregor Inczedy von Nagy-Varad ---> Baroness Agnes von Nagy-Varad ---> Countess Claudine Rhedey von Kis-Rhede — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.117.186.131 (talk) 09:15, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So what? There are two problems witht he inclusion of this. First, the source being cited for this information is not a reliable source - it shows descent from ancient trans-Atlantic travelers, the Emperor of America, and Atlantis - it cannot be trusted for anything; and second, an uncle 12 generations back, is just indiscriminate information. I can also find you a source that will give her a line from Ghengis Khan, but it also isn't trustworthy, and it also is too many generations to be worth mentioning. Agricolae (talk) 09:36, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, this isn't reliably sourced and should not be in the article. Dougweller (talk) 10:02, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Eastern Orthodox?[edit]

A recent change to this article involved this sentence: "The most notable ancestor of the Aba noble house was Samuel Aba, the third king of Hungary between 1041 and 1044, married to a sister of St. Stephen I, the first Roman Catholic king of Hungary," by inserting "(or Eastern Orthodox depending on view from the Great Schism of 1054)" after Roman Catholic. I'm a bit new to this area of history, so I'm wondering how this can be when Stephen I died in 1038. Can someone please explain? Thanks. History Lunatic (talk) 06:01, 26 October 2021 (UTC)History Lunatic[reply]