Talk:Crash reporter

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

This article is supported by WikiProject Computer Security (assessed as Low-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Answer question about Same-origin_policy
Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

iOS crash reporters[edit]

Wondering about adding a section, if not a separate page, for various iOS crash reporting solutions Doug Grinbergs (talk) 19:14, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Crash Reporter Lion[edit]

In Lion, Crash Reporter.app doesn't seem to exist; I'd update the article, but I have no idea where the net location is — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.176.1.103 (talk) 06:35, 6 May 2012 (UTC) Crash Reporter still exists in Lion and Mountain Lion, but they moved the files a bit, and Apple tries to submit the crashes by default. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.186.89.234 (talk) 01:13, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Apport[edit]

Where is it's section? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.208.12.118 (talk) 08:47, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Crash reporter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070102124137/http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/using/setup/expert/northrup_03october06.mspx to http://microsoft.com/windowsxp/using/setup/expert/northrup_03october06.mspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:34, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External Links ARE DEAD ! Only the last Link is still alive (2018-05-07 10:37 GMT)[edit]

Just want to help you by reporting:

External Links ARE DEAD ! Only the last Link is still alive, the one with 'mobile' in its title. 2018-05-07 10:37 GMT

Wouldn't a REALY SIMPLE tool help ?

one that READERS can use to submit such things ?

imagine ...

Gather all reports received by that tool in a DB.

maybe it would be necssary to store the expected answer to compare it with the - then - current one. (or somehow compare the http headers).

should be possible to automate such a task.

readers could report such things by a view clicks.

but ... thats just an idea ... sorry for my bad english.

Wikipedia is super, hope it helps. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.217.124.218 (talk) 08:47, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]