Talk:Crime in Melbourne

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Australia / Crime / Melbourne (Rated Start-class, High-importance)
WikiProject iconCrime in Melbourne is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Melbourne (marked as Top-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Australian crime.
 
Note icon
Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia.
Note icon
The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to help@wikimedia.org.au for other than editorial assistance.
edit·history·watch·refresh Stock post message.svg To-do list for Crime in Melbourne:

To create

Frank Benvenuto, Victor Brincat

Talk:Crime in Melbourne/archive 1 (April 1 2004 - October 15 2005)

archived[edit]

I've archived the old talk the page as the content is now completley different & has been reorganised Agnte 14:05, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

Gangland Killings[edit]

shouldnt this mention carl williams or tony mokbel? i just noticed it barely mentions organised crime at all.

Hmm something about the CBD, especially around Burke street. 166.205.137.161 (talk) 04:50, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

yes[edit]

There should definitely be a lot more on the gangland war - there was over 30 murders!

Ethikos (talk) 13:03, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Louisecharmianfaulkner.jpg[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

Image:Louisecharmianfaulkner.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 22:57, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

"Recent Times"[edit]

I have deleted everything within the heading "Recent Times", because the entire section was made up. Cyril Washbrook (talk) 09:26, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

As have I. --A Bothan Spy 10:07, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

The same user seems to have come back a couple of times now to restore the fake section. I've reverted it again. Cyril Washbrook (talk) 09:52, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
It's back, I will delete it again, anyone able to block 220.236.198.42 from editing? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.58.120.11 (talk) 01:16, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Someone keeps reverting it, please keep an eye out as it's pure fiction (speaking as someone who lives in Melbourne) Adonai-aus- (talk) 00:14, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Silkandmiller.jpg[edit]

The image Image:Silkandmiller.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --00:09, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

crime[edit]

where i the more crime in melbourne. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.246.72.124 (talk) 05:16, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

whitewash[edit]

This article seems to imply that melbourne is pretty safe, but it's way too dangerous at night, there's no go zones all over the place. 58.161.69.53 (talk) 14:42, 30 November 2010 (UTC)