Talk:Criticism of Wikipedia
|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Criticism of Wikipedia article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
|Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4|
|The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them.|
Please supply full citations when adding information, and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
|This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. Click [show] for further details.|
This article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:
|This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot I. Any threads with no replies in 90 days may be automatically moved. Sections without timestamps are not archived.|
|This page was nominated at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion on 18 June 2012. The result of the discussion was keep as a redirect.|
|This page was previously nominated for deletion. Please review the discussions if considering re-nomination:
Article on Wikipedia in the Harvard Educational Review
This article may be related to this page:
Fall 2009 Issue of the Harvard Educational Review
High School Research and Critical Literacy: Social Studies With and Despite Wikipedia by Houman Harouni
"Drawing on experiences in his social studies classroom, Houman Harouni evaluates both the challenges and possibilities of helping high school students develop critical research skills. The author describes how he used Wikipedia to design classroom activities that address issues of authorship, neutrality, and reliability in information gathering. The online encyclopedia is often lamented by teachers, scholars, and librarians, but its widespread use necessitates a new approach to teaching research. In describing the experience, Harouni concludes that teaching research skills in the contemporary context requires ongoing observations of the research strategies and practices students already employ as well as the active engagement of student interest and background knowledge."
The phraseology stating that Wikipedia allows anonymous editing, and that this leads to editorial vandalism, is questionable. Firstly, in theory, anybody could perform an act of vandalism on Wikipedia, whether anonymous or not. Secondly, Wikipedia undoubtedly receives many good edits from users who are anonymous and may not even be logged in. For me on this latter point, cf. Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) and go to the section on perennial proposals.
WP is highly dependent on external references (whether they have integrity or not is a topic for future discussion). When a link is broken, it diminishes the integrity of the article reference, yet WP does not automatically find or adjust to broken links. I'd like to see WP create a bot to eliminate broken links in main articles and talk pages. 2600:6C48:7006:200:D84D:5A80:173:901D (talk) 23:17, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ideological bias on Wikipedia. One of the proposed outcomes there is a merger with this article, so if you have an opinion on whether or not that merger would be a good idea, please comment. -- Netoholic @ 05:33, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
Peter Hitchens article in The Spectator
See it here https://www.spectator.co.uk/2018/08/war-of-words-my-battle-to-correct-wikipedia/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:A601:483:8900:503F:6C0D:2E63:7CEF (talk) 23:41, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Archived Talk Pages
I know that talk pages can get rather lengthy, particularly for controversial subjects, but by Archiving talk pages the primary discourse is lost to most viewers. I didn't even know Archived pages existed until I found one of my Talk page comments disappear, to be buried in an Archive (actually, the article has MULTIPLE talk archives) that some privileged user or Bot created. I'm disturbed by this. Issues disappear quickly this way, often unresolved. 2600:6C48:7006:200:D84D:5A80:173:901D (talk) 01:24, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- The links to the four archive pages (for this particular talk page) can be found near the top of the page. —PaleoNeonate – 07:56, 15 September 2018 (UTC)