Talk:Crush (video game)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Featured article Crush (video game) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophy This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on September 8, 2009.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
August 29, 2007 WikiProject peer review Reviewed
October 13, 2008 Featured article candidate Promoted
Current status: Featured article
WikiProject Video games (Rated FA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Featured article FA  This article has been rated as FA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Sega task force.
 
Note icon
This article has had a peer review which is now archived.

Fair use rationale for Image:Crush 2d.jpg[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

Image:Crush 2d.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:17, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Crush 3d.jpg[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

Image:Crush 3d.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:18, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Crush boxart.jpg[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

Image:Crush boxart.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:20, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

References[edit]

A quick glance through the article revealed to me that several claims made were not sourced as claimed. This is just dire FA review work.--ZincBelief (talk) 12:51, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Some that you noted were actually in the source given - but in the hard-to-see-that-its-there second page of the reference (the stuff about MC Escher, etc.) The female persona can only be sourced to the game itself (and its only clear when playing it, as the voicework is decidedly female but there's no lines to establish any gender). The last statement seems to follow appropriately from the original source line "The acclaim didn't translate into sales in quite the way the team had hopes..." --MASEM (t) 13:00, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
True, I missed page 2, doesn't actually display properly in my browser. However - female voice and female persona are not the same thing. If it's a robot, an AI, then the persona can be said to be gender neutral. It is POV to say it is a female persona.--ZincBelief (talk) 13:07, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
The manual, and the doctor that created it, call the computer (it's not a robot or anything else like that, just a computer) a "her". I agree if it was just a female voice, attributing gender to it doesn't do much (eg, I wouldn't call Star Trek's computers to be "female" just because of the female voice). But both the manual and dialog distinctly add the gender. --MASEM (t) 13:34, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Ok, those should be used for the reference then.--ZincBelief (talk) 13:36, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Crush 3D[edit]

Crush 3D should probably be merged, right? --Mika1h (talk) 00:36, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Pretty much yes. This article's short enough that even if C3D is a total overall, it can incorporate those changes. --MASEM (t) 01:34, 1 September 2011 (UTC)