Talk:Dame Chocolate

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

grasjas por e esa telenovela[edit]

The part about her being "unattractive" isn't entirely true. In fact, she has a gorgeous body, featured prominently in the show with skimpy clothing. Her face is what would be considered unattractive, but only a couple of features are at fault. Her nose is unrealistically large and her two front upper teeth are quite large as well. She often wears scarves wrapped around her head to hide these features. --anon

Point taken. I changed it. Gracias. Yakuman 03:20, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article title[edit]

Shouldn't this be at Dáme Chocolate? Corvus cornix 18:50, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dame Chocolate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:43, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]