Jump to content

Talk:Daniel Coughlin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeDaniel Coughlin was a Philosophy and religion good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 23, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 30, 2011.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that recently retired Fr. Daniel Coughlin was the first Catholic priest to serve as Chaplain of the United States House of Representatives?

Assessment

[edit]
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, please place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page.

I have expanded this article, and request that someone reassess the "stub" categories noted on this discussion page. Thanks!NearTheZoo (talk) 13:38, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work. The stub ratings are determined by individual projects... you should leave a message on the talk pages of WP:WikiProject Chicago and WP:WikiProject_Biography/Politics_and_government, and ask them to come reassess it. It looks C or B class to me. Ocaasi c 14:09, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the links. Will do that now! Again--thanks! NearTheZoo (talk) 19:25, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Wikiproject Chicago rated article B, so after no answer from other projects, matched the B rating to WPBio and WPCatholicism. My understanding is that quality ratings can be matched, because "an article is an article," but that importance ratings depend on each project. Hope I'm right, and acted appropriately! NearTheZoo (talk) 14:53, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Daniel Coughlin/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Moray An Par (talk) 13:55, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will not use the GAN template if that's ok with you. I can only review this during my free time, and I don't got much during weekdays. This GAN is on-hold btw.

June 29

[edit]
  • Lead is quite short. It should summarize the whole article.
  • Since the lead is the summary of the article, it doesn't need any citations unless that fact being stated is unique to the lead. In which case, that means you didn't summarize well since the lead should not introduce any new facts apart from those mentioned in the article body.
  • External link "In addition, House Resolution 1216, introduced in 2010 by Congressman" is dead.
  • Per WP:POSTNOM, "Post-nominal letters, other than those denoting academic degrees, should be included." STL being an academic degree, it should be removed.
  • The gallery is real nice but please do integrate the pictures into the article. There's much boring blocks of texts that could be complemented by these photos.
  • I think the successor section belongs to the House of Reps section.
  • "with a degree in Theology". Theology should not be capitalized since it's not the proper name of the degree program which he took. I assume that it would be something like BA in Theology or Bachelor of Theology. Theology by itself is a discipline.
  • Link "House of Representatives" upon first mention in the House of Representatives section.
  • The see also section should not contain links that are already linked in the article. Unless you replace the see also list, the section should be removed.
  • While the use of citation templates is not required, good citation format is. So I advise you to use them in the cites. The references section doesn't look very professional.
  • Is this all? Did you try researching on other facts about him? Did he endorse any candidate? Was he involved in any cause? Is he notable for anything else? What other significant posts did he hold.

I am still to read much of the article. I still haven't checked it for prose and references. I will be posting any other concerns in the following days. Moray An Par (talk) 22:58, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Moray An Par -- I really apologize for not getting back to you sooner, but in my "real life" I have been a little swamped, and almost all the time I can afford to contribute to wikipedia has been used for the article, Religious symbolism in the United States military. I just don't think I can afford to put any time into the Daniel Coughlin article right now. If it would help for me to withdraw the GA nomination, I could do that. Please let me know what you think -- and again, I apologize for not responding sooner. NearTheZoo (talk) 23:23, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for responding. I would have to fail this nomination from now. Please feel free to nominate it again when you've addressed concerns posted here, and have enough time to do so. Moray An Par (talk) 06:27, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Daniel Coughlin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:43, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Daniel Coughlin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:10, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:37, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Done This image has been removed above. Regards, Jkg1997 (talkcontribsCA) 15:56, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]