Talk:Daniela Santanchè

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Ambox warning yellow.svg

I have removed material from this article that does not comply with our policy on the biographies of living persons. Biographical material must always be referenced from reliable sources, especially negative material. Negative material that does not comply with that must be immediately removed. Note that the removal does not imply that the information is either true or false.


Please do not reinsert this material unless you can provide reliable citations, and can ensure it is written in a neutral tone. Please review the relevant policies before editing in this regard. Editors should note that failure to follow this policy may result in the removal of editing privileges.--Scott Mac (Doc) 16:06, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

I've translated the page from it:wiki to have a full coverage of the subject--Dans (talk) 18:56, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the translation. I've been tidying it up a bit, changing historic stuff into the past tense and so forth. It still needs some work though. ascorbic (talk) 13:39, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

"Candidate prime minister"[edit]

Regarding the fact that she was along other two leftist politics the first woman cadidate prime minister in Italy: whoever wrote this does not know how the electoral system in Italy works. Voters elect the parliament. The president of the republic choses a prime minister. There are no candidates for prime minister in Italy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talkcontribs) 22:51, 17 April 2011

Formally speaking, you have a good point, but it seems a reasonable shorthand to say that e.g. Berlusconi was the candidate premier of the PdL, given that it was no mystery whom they would name if they got a majority, or close enough to it to impose their wishes.
That hardly seems to apply to a tiny party like La Destra, though. So I'm not entirely clear on what was intended here, maybe just that she was the leader of a party contesting the election? The text should probably be reworded but I'm not sure how to fix it myself. --Trovatore (talk) 23:05, 17 April 2011 (UTC)