Talk:Darkspore

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

citations[edit]

This website was just released http://darkspore.com/, im sure we can use this as a base for information. I have edited this wiki page. I have really tried to fix a lot of mistakes, please can you review my work. Here is also a game review by gamespot: http://www.gamespot.com/darkspore/reviews/darkspore-review-6310899/ (Annoyin Magician (talk) 03:48, 23 March 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Uhh, I don't think 'I dunno' is a credible reference. Jookia (talk) 23:39, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Release Date[edit]

For some reason, Wal-Mart's website lists the release date as May 10, 2011. Why is this? Alphius 02:40, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Now it says the release date is April 19, 2011. Alphius 18:20, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • And Target's website says the release date is December 31, 2025?!?! Alphius 20:15, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A demo became avalible on steam on the 28th of march - WIP downloading now... - Anon. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.48.58.148 (talk) 05:18, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My bad - its a beta not a demo - same Anon —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.48.58.148 (talk) 06:58, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There's not really much point putting "Anon" when the system automatically tells who commented anyway. Alphius 17:41, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Critical Reception[edit]

Are there any reviews for this game yet? I think that a critical reception section should be added. Alphius 17:40, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:GAMEGUIDE gamecruft[edit]

I added a {{StrategyWiki}} external link to this article to help cut down on the gamecruft in this article. The guide itself is currently a work in progress, but it would benefit both the guide and the article to move any strategy guide content to the link I added. Some of the information has already been copied over to appropriate areas. --Tathar (talk) 00:54, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Citations needed?[edit]

There is a lack of references. The first five footnotes are in the introduction, and all bar one of the remaining four are in (small) sections towards the end. Meanwhile, the bulk of the article (ss 1—8) are without citation (there is one footntote in s 7 but it does not relate to the article in any discernible manner). While the information is likely sourced from the game or offiial documentation, there is no mention of this. There are also issues of encyclopaedic style and general quality of writing. I would tentatively suggest a total rewrite, or removal of this content. 121.45.50.178 (talk) 13:15, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Darkspore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:18, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]